one-time donation
monthly
On
Comments on Menendez Climate Change Amendment
Summary of Key Points
- Based on the key temperature measurements of the last several decades, the actual data has shown no significant global warming trend. Therefore, the scientific facts do not support either climate alarmism or mandatory CO2 emission cuts.
- The available scientific evidence does not support the claim that the climate of the 20th century in many locations around the globe was unusual when compared to the previous 900 years. Claims that man-made emissions are causing "unprecedented" global warming have been seriously undermined by new research that shows much of the earth was warmer during the early Middle Ages.
- New research findings on the sun, including records of changes in the sun’s magnetism (and therefore its energy output) reaching back some 1,000 years, suggest a major natural influence on surface temperatures of the earth.
- New research on black carbon (soot) emissions, water vapor feedback effects, and CO2 concentration increases indicate that the climate system does not respond as current climate models predict.
- During the period from 1895 to 2002, a number of states show an actual declining trend in long-term average surface temperatures, including
- The proposed climate amendment would effectively overturn S. Res. 98, the Byrd-Hagel resolution, by endorsing the
- Proposals like the
- Low-cost, coal-fired electric power is vital to the jobs, incomes, and health of millions of Americans. Complete elimination of coal-fired power by Kyoto-style regulation could reduce household income by as much as $225 billion in 2010, and induce 14,000 to 25,000 premature adult deaths, especially among minorities and the poor.